JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 3, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Maria Socorro Hernandez Zuñiga Vs. Agencia Presidencial Para La Accion Social Y La Cooperacion

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Primero De Menores De Bucaramanga Y El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Santander Sala Disciplinaria. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Primero De Menores De Bucaramanga
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Agencia Presidencial Para La Accion Social Y La Cooperacion Internacional
  • Entidad descentralizada por servicios del orden nacional según Ley 489 de 1998
  • Naturaleza jurídica
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Discrepancia sobre la naturaleza de la acción presentada
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REMITASE el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado
  2. Primero. de Menores de Bucaramanga, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida sin mas dilacion la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Maria Socorro Hernandez Zuniga, contra la Agencia Presidencial para la Accion Social y la Cooperacion Internacional, Accion Social.
  3. Segundo. ENVIESE copia de esta providencia, para informacion, al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Santander, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, Sala de Decision Numero Dos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.